Similar Posts
- Everyone hates a slow queue. Most hate a slow server even more. Online retailers need to get up to speed. Quickly.
- Do you need a dedicated server? Test your business against Intel’s 8-point checklist.
- New website helps ‘buy Australian’
- The crisis of credit visualised
- ANTMART DEAL: How to get a stationery pack… plus goat!
Picture this. You are at a party. You casually mention a problem you’ve had with your computer. You were probably joking and laughed a little after you described the issue.
Before you know it, someone you barely know creeps up to your ear and whisper the words “you need a server” and then disappears before they ever really showed up… a bit like HD DVDs.
You are left confused and on your own with those words ringing in your ear.
On Monday you commence the week’s work on your small business by calling your computer person. You tell them you need a server. Some of your computer guys will rub their hands with glee and forward you a quote ASAP. Others will ask you why?
Do you know why you want a server?
Don’t feel bad, most people don’t even know what a server is, let alone what they’ll do with it.
And you know what? Neither do I. Of course technically I know what a server is and does, I just don’t know why small businesses would need one these days.
To some degree, this is a symptom of a broader problem — technology for technology’s sake. Look around you and ask yourself what your favourite technology does for you, why and how well.
Chances are you’ll find the things that do the best jobs are specialists, not generalists, and were purchased to solve a problem (as opposed to sitting in the corner to increase the overall shininess of your environment).
Whether a server is a specialist or a generalist tool is up to you and your budget. If you suspect the ghostly server-suggestion appeals as a general solution to a myriad of ills, think again. I mean that literally. Think about it again. Then ask your computer guy the question they should have asked you: “What do I need a server FOR?” If you don’t understand the answer, then chances are it isn’t going to solve any of YOUR problems.
Here’s one example for you. Many people are sold servers on the promise of “better backups”.
However, in the last two years the cost-effectiveness and availability of simple cloud-based data backup and file sharing has dramatically improved.
To extend the example a little further, I am using a $1,200 box to centrally store my data on a RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks). I have added to that an offsite backup strategy which incorporates an additional external hard disk to the value of round $300. I have a weekly backup process that I execute religiously. Obviously, I am not paying for technical support so for me this is a cost-effective solution.
However, using a product like SugarSync — one example of many such products — I could store all my data in the cloud for $250 a year. You can weigh up the pros and cons yourself, and beware there are cons. It may even sound expensive for something you can’t touch or ever actually own.
However, when you consider the lifespan of computing hardware, this is actually quite cheap. All hard disks and technology fail sooner or later. Based on the cost of the hardware I have now, the money I’ve spent is equivalent to a six year subscription with SugarSync and we’ve not even factored in Moore’s law yet. That is a good bet. I doubt any of my hardware will last that long. When my hardware does fail, I’ll have nothing tangible left and I’ll have to pay to have it disposed of.
I could go on, but you get the drift.
Server me once, shame on you, server me twice… bugger! I just realised what that guy at the party actually said.
David Moore has 25 years experience in the computer industry and is now Principle PC Hater at ihatemypc.com.au.
Photo: ladyb
Learn from Threadless, Etsy, BoingBoing and more
Want an ad like this?G
lobal creative industry leaders are coming to Sydney for Vivid (25 May- 11 June). Find out how to harness crowd funding; predict the next shift in tech adoption; explore the DNA of startups; turn failure into success. Most events free or under $30.









David Reply:
March 11th, 2010 at 8:44 am
…it was just an example, a very intentionally brief example.
I did say it is one of a myriad of such solutions.
The problems you cite are definitely to be considered.
There is no one-size-fits-all answer to backups (read back through my previous Anthill posts on just theis topic).
Regarding time for download from cloud based backup, I have found that most people don’t want or need all 250GB of data now.
In fact most small business and home users get away with 30 to 60GB cloud storage and only ever want “the document they were just working on” and email back immediately. The rest is there for when it is needed.
Thanks for your feedback
David
[Reply]
Paul Zagoridis Reply:
March 11th, 2010 at 11:43 pm
Nice points Alan – you beat me to them. I’ve just had my second external HDD fail at home. The first was 250GB and the recent was 1TB. All containing our ripped CD collection, photos, archived email, documents, research.
I’m pulling my hair out thinking a $900 WD Raid box may be the solutions because most of the data is digital content.
No David I don’t need all 250GB of data restored in one go. But 180GB of it is our family media. So I’m feeling the pain.
Cloud based backups wont work for that in Australia.
So your idea of multiple external hard drives is tempting with an off-site backup.
hmmm but how to backup the 2 laptops, 2 desktops, 2 ipods and 2 MP3 Players while synchronising our media.
I suspect I need a server AND a backup device.
[Reply]
David Reply:
March 15th, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Did you read my reply Alan then?
Clearly not.
IT WAS JUST AN EXAMPLE!
THERE IS NO SILVER BULLET!
This may help you work out more clearly what you really need http://anthillonline.com/data-backups-%E2%80%93-face-it-you%E2%80%99re-screwed/