<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why PRs are the last to &#8216;get&#8217; the internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Business help for entrepreneurs, startups and small business owners in Australia &#124; Business &#62; Innovation &#62; Technology &#62; Entrepreneurship - Anthill Magazine: It&#039;s Where Ideas and Business Meet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Tuckerman</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-14319</link>
		<dc:creator>James Tuckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-14319</guid>
		<description>As a follow up to this post, I have just published: 

&#039;Which PRs actually &#039;get&#039; the internet&#039;.

http://anthillonline.com/which-prs-get-the-internet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a follow up to this post, I have just published: </p>
<p>&#8216;Which PRs actually &#8216;get&#8217; the internet&#8217;.</p>
<p><a href="http://anthillonline.com/which-prs-get-the-internet/" rel="nofollow">http://anthillonline.com/which-prs-get-the-internet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenni Beattie</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-12070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenni Beattie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-12070</guid>
		<description>Your readers might be interested in a report released recently entitled
&quot;The 2009 Digital Readiness Report&quot;.

The study was conducted by Eric Schwartzman with the support of online newsroom provider iPressroom, Korn/Ferry International, the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) and Trendstream and examined pr social media skills.

Key findings included: 

.When searching for prospective new hires, social media communications skills are nearly as important as traditional media relations skills. 

· Public relations leads marketing in the management and oversight of all social media communications channels within organizations. 

· Marketing leads public relations in the management and oversight of bulk email communications and search engine optimization. 

· Social networking, blogging and micro-blogging skills are the three most important social media communications skills for job candidates to have, according to public relations and marketing hiring decision makers. 

You can access the report at http://www.ipressroom.com/readiness 

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your readers might be interested in a report released recently entitled<br />
&#8220;The 2009 Digital Readiness Report&#8221;.</p>
<p>The study was conducted by Eric Schwartzman with the support of online newsroom provider iPressroom, Korn/Ferry International, the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) and Trendstream and examined pr social media skills.</p>
<p>Key findings included: </p>
<p>.When searching for prospective new hires, social media communications skills are nearly as important as traditional media relations skills. </p>
<p>· Public relations leads marketing in the management and oversight of all social media communications channels within organizations. </p>
<p>· Marketing leads public relations in the management and oversight of bulk email communications and search engine optimization. </p>
<p>· Social networking, blogging and micro-blogging skills are the three most important social media communications skills for job candidates to have, according to public relations and marketing hiring decision makers. </p>
<p>You can access the report at <a href="http://www.ipressroom.com/readiness" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipressroom.com/readiness</a> </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gillian</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-12019</link>
		<dc:creator>Gillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-12019</guid>
		<description>I think a lot of the PR consultants who have participated in this dicussion have hit the nail on the head. Often there is a discrepancy between what the PR consultant wants to do in the media campaign and what the client wants and it&#039;s up to the PR consultant to use their vast experience and expertise in the industry (this is of course what they are being paid for) to convince the client otherwise. 

I was lucky to work in a company and had international clients who had the means, resources and foresight to be able to provide interactive DVDS which had electronic media releases, images and videos that they could put directly onto their website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a lot of the PR consultants who have participated in this dicussion have hit the nail on the head. Often there is a discrepancy between what the PR consultant wants to do in the media campaign and what the client wants and it&#8217;s up to the PR consultant to use their vast experience and expertise in the industry (this is of course what they are being paid for) to convince the client otherwise. </p>
<p>I was lucky to work in a company and had international clients who had the means, resources and foresight to be able to provide interactive DVDS which had electronic media releases, images and videos that they could put directly onto their website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are PRs the last to get the internet &#124; Public Relations Sydney</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11864</link>
		<dc:creator>Are PRs the last to get the internet &#124; Public Relations Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11864</guid>
		<description>[...] Tuckerman, editor of Australian Anthill thinks that PRs are the last to ‘get’ the internet. He is taking the usual journalist dig at PR people. At CP Communications we are all for online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tuckerman, editor of Australian Anthill thinks that PRs are the last to ‘get’ the internet. He is taking the usual journalist dig at PR people. At CP Communications we are all for online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why PRs are the last to ‘get’ the internet &#8211; Anthill Magazine &#171; In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11808</link>
		<dc:creator>Why PRs are the last to ‘get’ the internet &#8211; Anthill Magazine &#171; In Front Of Your Nose: An online PR blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11808</guid>
		<description>[...] PRs are the last to ‘get’ the internet &#8211; Anthill&#160;Magazine     via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PRs are the last to ‘get’ the internet &#8211; Anthill&nbsp;Magazine     via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Thomas</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11793</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11793</guid>
		<description>Great post James. As someone with the inverse experience to HNap (I&#039;ve been back in Aus since 2005 after many years in UK), I have to say that I agree with you to a certain extent but there are definitely MANY PRs here who are doing some great stuff. However, I&#039;m constantly surprised more aren’t embracing it, especially given the ROI of online PR compared to traditional PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post James. As someone with the inverse experience to HNap (I&#8217;ve been back in Aus since 2005 after many years in UK), I have to say that I agree with you to a certain extent but there are definitely MANY PRs here who are doing some great stuff. However, I&#8217;m constantly surprised more aren’t embracing it, especially given the ROI of online PR compared to traditional PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11788</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11788</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone

Surely it&#039;s less about delineating where “coverage” appears…and more about PR people providing a service to media when they have appropriate editorial fodder?  Good PR people should let this be the determining factor as to which media vehicles they approach and why?  Less of the “junkie” hit mentality; more about providing a relevant intermediary service between business and media.

There are readers of traditional print media who will be interested target audiences for specific clients; and likewise for online media/users.  And clearly there is cross over in between!

Now…having said all of that James…are you ever going to get back to this pesky PR about Ash Hunter?!  I believe him firmly relevant for Anthill readers – be they online, offline, or on the moon.  ;)

Sarah @ Gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone</p>
<p>Surely it&#8217;s less about delineating where “coverage” appears…and more about PR people providing a service to media when they have appropriate editorial fodder?  Good PR people should let this be the determining factor as to which media vehicles they approach and why?  Less of the “junkie” hit mentality; more about providing a relevant intermediary service between business and media.</p>
<p>There are readers of traditional print media who will be interested target audiences for specific clients; and likewise for online media/users.  And clearly there is cross over in between!</p>
<p>Now…having said all of that James…are you ever going to get back to this pesky PR about Ash Hunter?!  I believe him firmly relevant for Anthill readers – be they online, offline, or on the moon.  <img src='http://anthillonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sarah @ Gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Tuckerman</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11776</link>
		<dc:creator>James Tuckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11776</guid>
		<description>Hi Amy,

Not ALL public relations consultants - just MANY.

There&#039;s some discussion about abbreviating public relations consultants to PRs above. And they are probably right. Because the real job of a public relations consultant is to &#039;consult&#039;.

If your client wants to appear in a print product that is not aligned with their market, has a narrow reach, is less effective than other mediums but their mum reads it (or, more likely, their board), it&#039;s your job to consult them that they should be doing otherwise.

If they are still looking for the less effective option and are not happy with the more effective option, so be it. 

But if you can give them statistics, such as referring site traffic, and ask them to compare that with less measurable mediums, you&#039;ll soon find yourself dealing with digital converts (counting clicks can become highly addictive).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amy,</p>
<p>Not ALL public relations consultants &#8211; just MANY.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s some discussion about abbreviating public relations consultants to PRs above. And they are probably right. Because the real job of a public relations consultant is to &#8216;consult&#8217;.</p>
<p>If your client wants to appear in a print product that is not aligned with their market, has a narrow reach, is less effective than other mediums but their mum reads it (or, more likely, their board), it&#8217;s your job to consult them that they should be doing otherwise.</p>
<p>If they are still looking for the less effective option and are not happy with the more effective option, so be it. </p>
<p>But if you can give them statistics, such as referring site traffic, and ask them to compare that with less measurable mediums, you&#8217;ll soon find yourself dealing with digital converts (counting clicks can become highly addictive).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11758</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11758</guid>
		<description>Yes, yes...  This makes my blood boil (short fuse due to the eternal struggle of trying to narrow the gap between what clients want to do and what journalists want).  

I work in the Public Relations industry.  I am not a Public Relations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes&#8230;  This makes my blood boil (short fuse due to the eternal struggle of trying to narrow the gap between what clients want to do and what journalists want).  </p>
<p>I work in the Public Relations industry.  I am not a Public Relations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bennett</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11750</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11750</guid>
		<description>In my experience there are two clear and distinct camps. The PRs who get online often really get it. Those who don&#039;t are seriously out of touch, but in many cases either aren&#039;t aware of their lack of knowledge or don&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience there are two clear and distinct camps. The PRs who get online often really get it. Those who don&#8217;t are seriously out of touch, but in many cases either aren&#8217;t aware of their lack of knowledge or don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11749</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11749</guid>
		<description>Hi - I have to disagree with your points about PRs being the last to &#039;get&#039; the internet.

I think it entirely depends on what the client in question is looking for. Some clients only want print coverage, so even if you get them an article on a high ranking site, they still won&#039;t be happy! Personally whilst it&#039;s great to get your client print coverage and it is exciting to see their name in a national paper, I equally see the value and explain to my clients the value of achieving online coverage at a site that either targets their key audience, or is a site with just as much, if not far greater reach than any paper could hope to achieve.

So whilst you may think that some people just dismiss the value of the internet, I think it&#039;s quite short sighted of you to assume that everyone working in PR doesn&#039;t &#039;get&#039; the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I have to disagree with your points about PRs being the last to &#8216;get&#8217; the internet.</p>
<p>I think it entirely depends on what the client in question is looking for. Some clients only want print coverage, so even if you get them an article on a high ranking site, they still won&#8217;t be happy! Personally whilst it&#8217;s great to get your client print coverage and it is exciting to see their name in a national paper, I equally see the value and explain to my clients the value of achieving online coverage at a site that either targets their key audience, or is a site with just as much, if not far greater reach than any paper could hope to achieve.</p>
<p>So whilst you may think that some people just dismiss the value of the internet, I think it&#8217;s quite short sighted of you to assume that everyone working in PR doesn&#8217;t &#8216;get&#8217; the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-08-11 — Des Walsh dot Com</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11737</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-08-11 — Des Walsh dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11737</guid>
		<description>[...] Why PRs are the last to ‘get’ the internet &#8211; Anthill Magazine James Tuckerman presents a compelling case for PR people to place a higher value on the potential of online marketing and acknowledges that even those who do get the point may may (will?) need to educate their clients. (tags: pr public+relations anthill Australia)     var addthis_pub = &#039;&#039;; var addthis_language = &#039;en&#039;;var addthis_options = &#039;email, favorites, digg, delicious, myspace, google, facebook, reddit, live, more&#039;; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why PRs are the last to ‘get’ the internet &#8211; Anthill Magazine James Tuckerman presents a compelling case for PR people to place a higher value on the potential of online marketing and acknowledges that even those who do get the point may may (will?) need to educate their clients. (tags: pr public+relations anthill Australia)     var addthis_pub = &#8221;; var addthis_language = &#8216;en&#8217;;var addthis_options = &#8216;email, favorites, digg, delicious, myspace, google, facebook, reddit, live, more&#8217;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Tuckerman</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11732</link>
		<dc:creator>James Tuckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11732</guid>
		<description>Hi Rod, 

You may have &#039;outed yourself&#039; unnecessarily.

In Telstra&#039;s defence, it was actually another awards program I was referring to. In fact, your guys were swift and nimble and sent me a video package with amazing efficiency. 

However, my later comments regarding where your web traffic comes from, would be worth looking into, if you do not already do that.

Only then will you know who to prepare those audio/video reels for. Because, you&#039;re right. Most of the mainstream media will still view such &#039;novelties&#039; with fear and apprehension.

But they&#039;re unlikely to be the ones linking to the awards site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rod, </p>
<p>You may have &#8216;outed yourself&#8217; unnecessarily.</p>
<p>In Telstra&#8217;s defence, it was actually another awards program I was referring to. In fact, your guys were swift and nimble and sent me a video package with amazing efficiency. </p>
<p>However, my later comments regarding where your web traffic comes from, would be worth looking into, if you do not already do that.</p>
<p>Only then will you know who to prepare those audio/video reels for. Because, you&#8217;re right. Most of the mainstream media will still view such &#8216;novelties&#8217; with fear and apprehension.</p>
<p>But they&#8217;re unlikely to be the ones linking to the awards site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Tuckerman</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11731</link>
		<dc:creator>James Tuckerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11731</guid>
		<description>Great idea! Watch this space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea! Watch this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley-Ann</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/why-prs-are-the-last-to-get-the-internet/#comment-11730</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley-Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=12026#comment-11730</guid>
		<description>Maybe Anthill could consider running some webinars for Marketers and PRs on how to find their way around the finer points of web traffic? Be part of the solution...so to speak. Just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Anthill could consider running some webinars for Marketers and PRs on how to find their way around the finer points of web traffic? Be part of the solution&#8230;so to speak. Just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

