When I posted a comment to the article ‘5 must-sees before Australian VCs will invest‘, the truth is that I didn’t even need to read the article to know the gist of what it said. (No offense intended to the author, Steve Anderson. I don’t mean the article was predictable… but that business people are.)

When I actually did read it, I was not mistaken in my assumptions.

I consider this article as a literary kick in the privates for those who need it most.

In response to my comment, Anthill editor-in-chief James Tuckerman invited me to write about what I, as an inventor, want from investors.

It’s really quite simple.

1. I want someone to develop a process for communication with investors that safeguards my intellectual property, so that I can begin talking to them in the first place.
2. I want someone to risk money on pre-seed stagers like myself who don’t have enough resources of their own.
3. I want VCs to be open to negotiation, instead of just dictating non-negotiable terms.

IP protection

Regarding my first requirement, surely VCs have had years of experience with IP. And surely by now the investment industry must have come up with a nice neat process that lets inventors/entrepreneurs enter a room and have a conversation knowing that no one would dare try to steal their idea.

I can’t possibly be the first inventor or entrepreneur who has gone to a meeting with a VC and been unable to really provide the detail I wanted to give because the protection to have that candid conversation was absent.

Surely, to be good at being an investor you must have solved the common problems of people who come seeking your experience and advice?

Surely, you wouldn’t want to miss out on brilliant investment opportunities because you never even get to hear them in the first place?

And surely, you haven’t just been sitting on your arses doing absolutely nothing about this requirement for however many decades (over a century) that your industry has been in existence?

Oh, you have been sitting on your arses doing nothing about it?

Are you mental?!

Now, I know you are going to say either:

A. That’s your responsibility, not ours.
B. We can sign a non-disclosure agreement.
C. You have to trust someone sooner or later.

Well, that’s just not good enough for most innovators.

You are the ones who have been doing it so long; you should have an easy-to-follow no/low-cost process for this. And if you haven’t thought of one, here… allow me.

Don’t just stop at a non-disclosure agreement (which I notice that some of you don’t even start with), but back this signed agreement with a video camera recording the meeting and give a copy of it to the person who came to see you seeking financial backing.

The effect of doing this would be that anyone entering your office to discuss an idea with you would know that you are serious about making them feel secure about their IP so they can relax and actually tell you all about it.

I was asked more than once by someone I don’t even know to “trust them”… and I just think this is the laziest possible response.

Please tell me that you are not so ignorant of your own industry that you haven’t heard stories of people being ripped off, or pushed into unfair contractual situations. Why, oh why, would you think that someone smart and creative enough to invent something worthwhile is going to ignore this very obvious fact that the very last thing they should do is to trust you.

I will go one step further than that and tell you that my own personal philosophy about business is that, since so many people have proven themselves to be so dishonest in business, surely it makes no sense to trust anyone. What I trust is that you have done something about it, for this shows me that you are thinking, and that you are thinking about my needs, not just your own.
I would prefer to leave the trust until later, and to have a lot of reasons for actually giving it by that time.

Pre-seed investment

The next thing on the list is that I want someone to risk their money on pre-seed stage projects.

What I need is for someone to decide that the concepts I have in mind are worthy of due diligence on a full business plan, and to provide me with the money I need to live and work on that full time, as if it was my job. There is precedence for this too, you know? Ever heard of a publishing contract? It’s basically the same idea that has been used in both the literature and music professions to support an artist while they produce their works.

I think it would take me at most a few months to complete such a full business plan (or at least enough of it to actually be a viable project or take it to the next stage), given the resources to focus on it and spend a little on research or a consultant’s advice where necessary.

Negotiations

The final thing I want is to have a realistic negotiation… and that means no preconditions without a justifiable reason.

For example, you might say a reasonable precondition is that the cost of recording the initial meeting is going to be charged retrospectively to the business (if it goes ahead) as a loan at a given interest rate. There is nothing unfair about that.

I also don’t think it would be unreasonable to say that, if I do get the pre-seed support to develop the business plan, this money also should be paid back by the business as a retrospectively applied loan.

Another reasonable request would be that all net profits go to repaying investors’ money before I can take anything myself (as a shareholder). I wouldn’t complain about that, and it does make up for the risk being taken with that money if there is a guaranteed rate of interest return.

You wouldn’t have risked the money in the first place if you didn’t think it was a worthy project, right?

Also, don’t expect to just walk in and say, “We want 40 percent,” (or whatever percentage it is that you are after). You keep the percentage share in accordance with the separate components that you have earned!

For example, if you have provided me with support while I complete the full business plan required to properly set out all the specifications of the project, then depending on the estimated size of the business income over the first five to ten years, you might argue for one to five percent of shares in the case of a very large business, or perhaps up to 10 percent if it is a smaller business. In this way, we can separate the allocation of ownership into chunks, and actually see a relevant value proposal for each of these investments.

Then, when it comes to providing the further capital for actually getting the business all rolling and following that plan, firstly you have only gotten to this stage if the previous stages have all been completed (so this is benefiting you, too, because it’s reducing your risk), and secondly it will be easier to see whether your expected percentage share at this stage is reasonable, and easier to seek that funding elsewhere if you are unwilling to be reasonable all of a sudden.

Which brings me to my final point of what I mean by “realistic negotiation”, which is that you cease this expectation that I am going to get out of the business entirely so that you end up with 100 percent of it. And the same thing goes for you taking a majority share just because you are risking the money. That is not reasonable, particularly not as a precondition that does not take into account the amount of money going into it versus the potential gains, and the actual vision behind the concept.

If you want me to hand over a business to you that I believe has the potential to become a multibillion dollar business, well the only way you are going to do that is by paying me multiple billions of dollars. Would you sell it for less?

And I know you will say, “It’s better to have five percent of something that 100 percent of nothing,” but I disagree. No, it isn’t. I would feel like a dipshit the rest of my life for letting you rip me off. Furthermore, I am a creative person and I have many more projects I want to get off the ground, so if you prove to me your trust-worthiness, then you will become my investor of choice for the future.

A couple of final points:

• I know VCs are not interested in the technical details of the project… but get interested. If you don’t show an interest and make an effort to understand it, then I don’t want you as my business partner, because I am going to think you are an idiot. You expect inventors to understand your world, so you have to make an effort to understand ours.

• I would also much prefer to be in business with someone who is not so stupid that they will sabotage elements of the project to make it more profitable. I don’t mind efficiency, but it can be taken too far so that it destroys some of the best parts of the project.

• Understand that if you don’t do this stuff I am asking for, then you aren’t offering me anything at all. If the only difference between one VC and the next is the serial number on the actual currency you give me, then you are just an annoying middle-man making unreasonable requests, and taking profits. By the time I am in the position that you want me to be in before you would invest, believe me the last thing I would do is come to you. I would just go raise the capital myself.

Enough said.

Trevor Rose is a creative and technical problem solver, an inventor, and a sales, strategy and systems consultant.

Photo: Nazir Amin

This eBook by celebrated Australian entrepreneur and lecturer Dr Tom McKaskill was created to help high net worth individuals become successful angel investors.

Only $19.95!

Designed to help high net worth individuals become successful Angel Investors. Angel investing involves active mentoring and coaching of an early stage management team towards a successful exit or additional funding, probably from a venture capital firm. This book sets out a comprehensive and rigorous process which will help the Angel generate deal flow, evaluate investment proposals and manage the investment and subsequent harvest. The book also provides a useful guide to managing operational risks in the venture.

Many high net worth individuals are reluctant to invest in early stage entrepreneurial ventures because they are unsure of how to evaluate the investment or to manage their involvement. Even those that do undertake a limited number of investments are unsure how to best structure the deal or when to intervene to ensure their investment is protected. This book sets out:

• The role that Angels play in early stage ventures
• How they should generate a deal flow
• The manner in which they should evaluate potential investments
• How Angel Funds and Angel Networks work
• The contribution Angels should make to their investee firms
• How they should structure the investment deal
• How to develop a viable exit strategy
• The role of professional advisors
• Guidelines for operations risk management

Successful Angels know that investing in entrepreneurial ventures is more than just providing finance. There is an active involvement of the Angel in all aspects of the business. Successful Angel investing is active investing which requires the Angel to find the right investments to suit their personal knowledge, time and interests. Angel investors enjoy what they do but they also understand the risks involved. Those risks are substantially reduced with a systematic approach to the selection, management and harvesting of their investments.

An Introduction to Angel Investing shows how significant wealth can be achieved by private individuals through investments in high growth early stage entrepreneurial ventures.

Most wealthy individuals mistakenly believe that Angel Investing is beyond their means or outside their range of experience, but with the emergence of Angel Networks and Angel Funds, the majority of wealthy individuals can now participate in this class of investment.

Chapters:

1. Business Angels make a difference
2. An Angel profile
3. Sources of Private Equity
4. Your Angel activity profile
5. Strategic vs. Financial investments
6. Build a pipeline
7. Evaluating possible investments
8. Entry and exit considerations
9. Agreeing the investment
10. Managing your investments
11. Conclusion
A. Awareness and Alignment index
B. Venture Potential Index
C. Operations Development index

Testimonials:

“This book provides the essential basic groundwork for anyone contemplating investing in the exciting world of Angel investing.”
- John Mactaggart, Chairman Australian Association of Angel Investors

“I recommend this book to anyone who wants to learn more about angel investing.”
- Basil Peters, Angel Investor, Fund Manager for Fundamental TechnologiesII author of ‘Early Exits – Exit Strategies for Entrepreneurs and Angel Investors (But Maybe Not Venture Capitalists)’

“Anyone considering Angel investment should read this book.”
- Jordan Green, Founder/Chairman Melbourne Angels, Co-Founder/Deputy Chairman Australian Association of Angel Investors Limited

“An Introduction to Angel Investing by Tom McKaskill is a must read for any successful entrepreneur wishing to stay actively involved with early stage ventures. ”
- Andrew Loch, Chair Gold Coast Angels, Angel Investor & CEO of the Gold Coast Innovation Centre

“This book is a must read for anyone contemplating venturing out into the exciting world of Angel investing.”
- Baboo Jeena, Executive Chairman, Jeena Partners, Financial Services

“This book is a must read for any Angel looking to venture into the lucrative ‘Venture Capital Industry’.”
- Ivan Kaye, CEO BSI

“This could be considered as ‘the’ book on Angel investing.”
- Tony Falkenstein, Entrepreneur

Only $19.95!

This eBook by celebrated Australian entrepreneur and lecturer Dr Tom McKaskill was developed as an entrepreneur’s guide to securing venture finance. Only $19.95!

This eBook is aimed at those entrepreneurs who have high growth potential ventures and seek to raise finance to assist them to develop their business.

To secure the finance, the entrepreneur will have to demonstrate that their business is capable of achieving a premium on exit, usually through a strategic sale.

This book provides a checklist for the entrepreneur to assist in developing a strategy to raise finance.

Only $19.95 inc GST

Part A: Angel and Venture Capital Investment

1. A wealth creation partnership
2. Sources of Private Equity
3. Angel Investor finance
4. Strategic vs. Financial ventures
5. A compelling investment opportunity
6. Exit strategies
7. Preparing for the investment
8. Investor presentation techniques
9. Valuation
10. Finalising the investment
11. Conclusion

Part B: Investor Ready Indices

A. Awareness and Alignment
B. Venture Potential
C. Operations Development
D. Strategy

Testimonials

‘Many entrepreneurs have achieved great success by partnering with Angel investors but they need to have the right business venture and the right approach to external investment to attract investors. This book provides the essential guide for anyone contemplating seeking Angel investment.’
– John Mactaggart, Chairman Australian Association of Angel Investors

‘Through his experiences as a successful startup entrepreneur, business school professor, advisor and author, Dr. McKaskill provides some great insights and a comprehensive game plan for companies seeking Angel and VC funding. Raising
Angel & Venture Capital Finance is a great read for founders and entrepreneurs — whether they’re raising outside capital or just trying to understand the fundraising process — and just made our jobs as investors a lot easier.’
– Joe Platnick, Partner iGlobe Treasury Management Ltd. and Director Pasadena Angels

‘Tom is one of those unique individuals who has lived both a life of a successful entrepreneur and spent time understanding what makes them successful. This book is a synthesis of decades of this experience and is a must read for anyone
who wishes to understand how to raise capital from the venture capital managers and angel investor.’
– Richard Palmer, Investment Director, New Zealand Venture Investment Fund Limited

‘An entrepreneur only gets a few chances to pitch a venture capital group. This book will prepare you and significantly enhance your opportunity to receive funding.’
– Patrick Thean, President, Leadline Group, Inc., Charlotte, NC

Only $19.95 inc GST

It’s great to see entrepreneurs telling it how it really is and having the guts to make public statements about their experiences, to save others time, effort and disappointment when dealing with these investor groups.

No wonder there is such a great divide between entrepreneurs and these two groups, with VCs and angels having a well-worn approach that requires entrepreneurs to prove that their venture:

• has a unique product or service with proven global demand
• has bulletproof IP in place
• has established cash-flow
• has a first-class management and operational team
• has distribution and sales channels in place
• has excellent prospects for long-term growth
• has minimal risk (despite being a new venture)
• will provide well-paid Directorships for the incoming investors to attend an occasional meeting and provide “vital” business input.

VCs and angels often have the entrepreneur (after providing extensive details on the venture and its potential) “pitch” to groups of would-be investors (whose backgrounds and capabilities he/she has no knowledge of whatever) – a miniscule “stand up and wow them” presentation, so that these experts can instantly assess whether the venture has any real value.

Finally, the entrepreneur must demonstrate to these groups a well-defined “exit strategy” that includes producing 10x to 15x returns within three to five years for the new investors. The VC/angel rationale for this incredible demand is that “so few projects are winners that we need to make enormous profits from the ones that succeed”. In other words, “We need your project to make up for our selection of losers!”

It is obvious that the objectives of the two sides are misaligned, hence the miniscule percentage of projects that actually secure appropriate funding from these groups.

We constantly see reports on how Australia provides such little backing for innovation. Doesn’t that tell us that something has to change? That the current vehicles, attitudes and approaches are wrong?

My suggestion to entrepreneurs seeking funding and resources is… forget VCs… forget Angels. Seek out a business partner with a need that is aligned with your project.

Yes, you will still find that in presenting to these prospects you run into all the usual roadblocks… lack of vision, resentment that you have developed the new product or service (instead of their in-house people)… executives who have their own agendas and make sure your project doesn’t get to the decision-makers, others who will take your time and information and try to apply it while getting around your IP cover.

But… you have a far better chance of finding someone who has real commitment to your project and its objectives.

There is enough being written here (not just in VC month) to suggest there might be a leading role for Australian Anthill and other interested parties in initiating a new era of bringing entrepreneurs and business partners together in a very different and more consistently successful way?

Peter Clutton is a serial entrepreneur in the leisure/recreation sector, founder of Pro-Line Golf, joint-founder of Designer Fishing Lures and founder of Stylyx Bicycles (2009 Anthill Smart 100 #23)

It’s Venture Capital Month at Anthill. Click the image below to attend the event!

While the terms of the deal have not been disclosed (UPDATE: it was just shy of quarter of million for a significant minority share), Future Capital CEO Domenic Carosa said OurWishingWell.com was an attractive investment opportunity because of its rapid growth and excellent scalability.

Carosa, who joins the OurWishingWell.com board, established Future Capital in December 2008 following his controversial exit from destra Corporation – the company he founded and led for 15 years.

The fund’s major shareholders also include Danny Wallis (founder of ASX listed DWS), Andrew Abercrombie (founder of ASX listed Flexirent) and Simon Baker (ex-CEO of realestate.com.au).

OurWishingWell.com is an online gift registry and wishing well that allows people to contribute money towards any gifts for any event using a virtual gift system. The system handles all major currencies.

The company also provides a white-label solution, where other businesses can provide their own gift registry service using OurWishingWell technology; which is already powering a number of businesses in multiple countries.

OurWishingWell.com was named one of Anthill’s Smart 100 for 2009.

This August, we’ve decided to explore the many facets of capital raising – from angel investment and grants to venture capital and private equity.

For want of a better name, we’re calling this exercise Anthill’s VC Month.

Over the next four weeks, we’ll be bringing you a range of opinions, articles, videos and podcasts on this topic, culminating in an evening seminar and half-day workshop, to be held in collaboration with Design Victoria (aptly titled ‘Venture Capital by Design’).

To kick-start the activities, check out our Venture Capital Topic Centre.

Alternatively…

	Follow our ‘VC Month’ feed
	Join our newest Twitter Group – @anthillVC

Or simply subscribe to our Email Newsletter.

It’s time to join the VC train Anthillians. The buck starts here!

It’s Venture Capital Month at Anthill. Click the image below to attend the event!