- Anthill Magazine - http://anthillonline.com -
Negotiation and the ghost of Machiavelli
Posted By Paul Ryan On 11 November, 2009 @ 1:25 pm In Articles,Blogs,Featured Slider,Startup & Entrepreneurship | No Comments
Whether you prefer to be feared or loved, new research suggests that the important thing at the negotiation table is that you don’t try to be nice.
Several years ago, a newly married friend told me she was reading The Art of War [1], Sun Tzu’s masterly 6th Century BC book on military strategy, in search of ideas on how she should handle her mother-in-law. It was one of the funniest things I’d ever heard.
A few years later, I relayed this story to her husband after a game of squash. He told me that it was funny because he had recently read Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince [2], another seminal historical text on the strategic use of power, in a desperate search for strategies on how to keep his mother and wife from destroying each other. True story. Ain’t life grand?
Conflict and diplomacy are common themes in history, life and business. Machiavelli, the famous svengali in service of the Florentine Republic during the Renaissance, posed the question to anyone wielding power over others: “whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? [3]“
This conundrum, from the pages of The Prince, has divided Kings, CEOs and pubescent McDonald’s drive thru managers alike over the years.
Machiavelli concluded that, if a leader cannot be both, it is better to be feared than loved. But that philosophy has fallen from vogue [4] in recent decades as the information economy superseded the industrial economy and leaders realised that winning the love of their charges can inspire creativity, initiative and loyalty in addition to discipline and productivity. Of course, not everyone [5] is on board with this.
However, new research reveals that, when it comes to negotiations, attempting to win the love of the other party is not the most effective strategy.
Mara Olekalns, Melbourne Business School Professor of Management (Negotiations), found that effective negotiators convey competence — and that being nice only encourages deception and opportunistic betrayal by the other party.
She also found that the most likely trigger for deception in a negotiation is when one party perceives a power imbalance and thus a chance for exploitation. Being “nice” in a negotiation is likely to be perceived by the other party as a tactic to conceal information or motive, leading to a downward spiral of suspicion and concealment by both parties.
According to Olekalns, “My research shows that positive emotions increases creativity and encourages greater risk taking, and decreases the extent to which individuals scrutinise information. Deception requires creativity, risk and is assisted by the belief that the other party might be less likely to scrutinise information.”
Clearly, Machiavelli’s ghost sits at every negotiation table. So how can you improve your chances of negotiating a favourable outcome?
Paul Ryan is Editor of Anthill Magazine.
Article printed from Anthill Magazine: http://anthillonline.com
URL to article: http://anthillonline.com/negotiation-and-the-ghost-of-machiavelli/
URLs in this post:
[1] The Art of War: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Art_of_War
[2] The Prince: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prince
[3] whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved?: http://www.constitution.org/mac/prince17.htm
[4] fallen from vogue: http://hbr.harvardbusiness.org/2008/01/love-and-fear-and-the-modern-boss/ar/1
[5] not everyone: http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2001/mar/10/jobsadvice.careers
Click here to print.
Copyright © 2009 Anthill Magazine. All rights reserved.