5 steps to stand out in your market using internet video [WEBINAR]

img

If your product or service is so good, why is it priced so badly?

August 30, 2010 | By Greg Roworth

Today, I’m going off on a bit of a rant.

I can’t believe how many times lately that I’ve spoken to business owners who claim that their product or service is one of the best in their field. And I believe them. I have absolutely no doubt that they are right.

But then when I ask them how they position their pricing, they tell me they choose to set their pricing level in the middle of the market range.

Why?

To be competitive.

To me, that just doesn’t make sense. If the product is one of the best in the market, it obviously has more value than the average product. Yet, if the price is about average, the perception that gives the market is that the product must be average.

If you set your price as average, you lose all the benefit of having a product that is well above average. Even if you try to sell people on why your product is one of the best, but then tell them about your average or low price, you confuse people and they will end up not believing your claims.

You see, most people actually still believe that you get what you pay for. You really need to charge what you are worth, not only so you don’t confuse your customers, but so that you maximise your opportunities for sales and profits.

My experience with clients is that fear of competition is the main reason for not wanting to charge what they think they are worth. The fear is that if they increase their prices, they will lose customers.

The reality is that people place far greater importance on the extra value they receive from your better product or higher quality service than you may think.

Have you ever thought about the value of your reliability or the additional usage customers get from your product lasting longer? Have you ever calculated the added value your customers get from your faster delivery times or your lower return rate? You need to know these numbers so that you can use them to justify your higher prices.

That’s right. Charging average prices actually makes your ability to compete worse than if you charge higher prices.

It is actually easy to command higher prices if you also communicate the reasons your prices are higher and you appropriately justify the extra expense your customer should make now, for the savings or added value they get from their investment. You see, the problem is not a competition problem, but a marketing problem.

Most business owners are great at producing their product or service, but lack skills when it comes to marketing. The reason customers query your price compared to your competitors’ is that you haven’t actually communicated the added value they will get from you. When you give customers no other criteria to compare options, they can only resort to price comparisons.

I often find clients locked into a view that their market is highly competitive and that if they increased their prices they would lose too many valuable customers. My experience is that if any customers are lost by a price increase, it is normally the ones that are the most difficult to deal with and that you are better off without anyway.

The customers that value the extra quality or service you provide have typically been wondering why your prices are so low and have actually been expecting you to put them up the the level that charges what you are worth.

In almost every market I can think of, there are always a number of player that compete on price. Yet there are also some in that same industry or trade that charge much higher prices than the norm. Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me that the ones that charge higher prices are also the most successful in their field. That should tell you something.

Pricing is one of the most critical elements of profitability for any business. Yet very few operate at a strategic level in this area.

If you are trying to win work or sales by pricing competitively, it could be time to rethink your approach. You are just making business and your life harder than it needs to be. It’s time to start thinking more strategically about how you can charge what you are really worth and how you can effectively justify and communicate your extra value to your market.

Believe me, the effort will be well rewarded. The difference between what you charge now and what you are really worth, is all lost profit. Shouldn’t that be in your bank account rather than your customers’?

Greg Roworth is an business consultant and author of the book, Put Your Business on Autopilot. Discover how to create, in 7 steps, a business that really works at www.businessflightpath.com.

Start-ups to enter 2012 Telstra Australian Business Awards

Want an ad like this?

Logo e1328849448899 Start ups to enter 2012 Telstra Australian Business AwardsEntries are open for the Telstra Australian Business Awards. The HTC Start-Up Award has been introduced for businesses operating between one and three years. Now in their 20th year, the Awards offer $500,000 in cash and prizes for small and medium businesses.

To enter or nominate a business visit telstrabusinessawards.com

 

  • http://twitter.com/altima_au Alexander Levashov

    It is nice in the theory, but in practice, the price is an important factor for many buyer. If you see 2 proposition with the similar value but one is priced lower, I bet you take the one with lower price. The higher price indeed may increase the perceived value, but there is a limit of such increase.
    Also, the higher is your price, the more narrow is your market. It works even for monopolies, when people have no choice.
    Having the price in the middle make a sense, most buyers (that confirmed by consumer behaviour researches) try to avoid extreme points and take a product with a middle price. Think about how many people buy Toyota or Holden and how many buy Porche. Furthermore, guess what will happen if Holden start price their cars at Porche’s level.

    So I would beware simply double the prices and expect to have same number of deals with much higher profitability.

    BTW, I followed the link to the site author’s web site and to be honest it doesn’t look like he spent a lot of money to it. I would say that it looks like lower-middle level web site, simple design, Paypal checkout. Maybe I am wrong, but that is my impression.

    [Reply]

    David Kellam Reply:

    Both approaches are right, but looking at price alone is misleading. You should be looking at price * volume – i.e. the area under the price/volume curve. Well, you’d be looking at net profit but as that can include fixed and variable components, can be a little trickier.

    At a whole-of-market level, this usually results in multiple price ‘segments’.
    At a firm-specific level, you often have the choice of optimising for several price equilibria, all of which are equally (or nearly so) profitable. From a strategic perspective, maximising your points of differentiation gives you the most choices over which segment to play in. Around/within a particular segment, the same applies but you will find yourself more restricted by price sensitivities if you try to pitch between two segments (which will just confuse people).

    More stories of this:
    http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/CamelsandRubberDuckies.html
    http://www.sandhill.com/opinion/daily_blog.php?id=19

    [Reply]

    Greg Roworth Reply:

    Great response David. It’s profit that’s important at the end of the day, not sales volume. Anyone in the SME area should leave concepts like market share to the big players. Find the sweet spot where you can maximise your profits with a price point that reflects real value and enables you to sell less, make more money and work less at the same time. You just need to work a bit harder on marketing and communicate your message to the right market. The effort is trivial compared to the payoff if you get it right.

    [Reply]

  • http://twitter.com/altima_au Alexander Levashov

    duplicate, so deleted

    [Reply]

  • Rhondalynn

    I LOVE it! Each and every week we all overpay for one particular commodity. It is priced at 3000-9000 times what it is worth…. Bottled water. The stuff that comes out of our tap is perfectly drinkable and costs $1.2/tonne (as compared to bottled water which costs upwards of $3000/tonne).

    Yet, most of us do it and no one ever seems to complain. If the beverage industry can charge this much for something that is practically free, surely you and I can charge what our products/services are actually worth!

    For more elaboration, check out my blog exactly on this point…
    http://www.imagineeringunlimited.com/blog/?p=98

    [Reply]

    Greg Roworth Reply:

    Great article Rhondalynn. Right on the money too. It’s definitely all about the marketing and communicating a value that people will pay top dollar for. That’s where most business owners fall down. They don’t work at marketing and hope to get sales because their product costs less than others. It’s not a great way to do business, but oh so common.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.ICTStrategicServices.com.au Paul Hauck

    We also see a lot of under-pricing in the ICT industry from small software developers who underinvest in marketing (as a ‘necessary evil’) and hence see too small a pool of sales leads. This makes them criticall dependent on a very high close rate and leaves them with a fairly weak understanding of their market (as opposed to their product or technology). They are left competing on price and fairly desperate, which leads to under-pricing. Many become locked into this cycle and never succeed in getting over the ‘professional marketing’ hurdle on the growth path (often in the A$1-3.5M revenue range).

    Great stuff – keep up the good advice.

    [Reply]

  • Nobby

    The story is very true, and inidcates a possible lack of confidence on the behalf of the product seller. And I can understand that. I am about to release a new program onto the market which deals with debt elmination, but wanted to sell it at just one price.
    I didn’t want to be mucking around with monthly memberships and rop offs. Aftera ll. my knowledge and expertise as a previous financial planner have now been put to good use, and I expect to be fairly compensated.
    The dilema is that the people who need this most, are generally the ones who can least afford to pay the one off price. So I am resigned to membership and a $37.00 monthly payment, but without benefits.
    Those who pay the full price upfront of $1697.00 will be offered the opportunity to make their money back through affiliateship sales and referrals. While those on monthly won’t.
    I’ll also rebadge the program for a mid point price range $997.00one off price without benefits.
    So the perception of value can now be chosen by the user, and those who can afford it in their own way.
    Value will be in the pocket of the user. Just like Rhondalynns’ example of water.
    It’s like selling ice to Eskimos!

    [Reply]

    Alexander Levashov Reply:

    Human brain researches show us that confident people are wrong as often as less confident. So anybody can be perfectly confident and perfectly wrong. It called ‘overconfidence bias’ and most people tend to have it.

    Take off: if you are confident that your product or service deserves higner pricing it doesn’t mean that it is true and consumers share your opinion.

    [Reply]

blog comments powered by Disqus

Find Us on facebook

Latest Video

9 things a 9 month-old can teach you about online marketing [VIDEO]

This morning, I sat down with my 9-month old son, Julian, to feed him breakfast. This is one of the jobs allocated to me as a first-time, new father. Remembering the arduous steps required to complete yesterday morning’s meal (and the day before that), and contemplating how bizarre it is that I must work so hard to provide him something that will make him stronger and healthier and happier, I began to think about online marketing. Yes, the brain works in mysterious ways. (And I am kind of sleep deprived.)

More>>

Latest Comments

Ant Mart

Anthill Amabassadors

Marketing & Media

Sponsored by Do you need branding advice you can trust?

For over 20 years, SIGNARAMA consultants have been working closely with companies to create customised branding and signage strategies.

More>>

thumb

Tech & Innovation

Sponsored by AusIndustry

AusIndustry is a specialist program delivery division within the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research.

More>>

thumb

Tech & Innovation

Sponsored by Google

What do you know about Google AdWords? This hub was developed to answer the questions you already have, and those you haven’t thought yet to ask.

More>>

thumb

Anty-Climax

Sponsored by Antmart

It’s a group buying site specifically created for entrepreneurs and business builders.

More>>

thumb

Upcoming Events

FEB
29

The 5th annual Angel Investor Conference to focus on sustainability of investment

Sustainability of investment is the main focus of the 5th Annual National Angel Investor Conference. The Melbourne Angels are inviting entrepreneurs to come, collaborate, hear about the latest industry trends and learn of smart investment oppourtunities.

More>>

Jan
9

Spruce up your video pitch for Innovation Bay’s next Angels Dinner

For those of you who’ve not had the pleasure, Innovation Bay’s Angel Dinners bring together angels and entrepreneurs. To date, the organisation has assisted entrepreneurs raise over $10 million in seed investment as a result of these dinners. (Heard of Spreets? Yup? Innovation Bay kick started the group buying behemoths capital raising endeavours.) If you’re an entrepreneur in the high-tech space and fancy a bit of funding, you may wish to apply.

More>>