<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to trump cunning linguistics and seize competitive advantage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/</link>
	<description>Business help for entrepreneurs, startups and small business owners in Australia &#124; Business &#62; Innovation &#62; Technology &#62; Entrepreneurship - Anthill Magazine: It&#039;s Where Ideas and Business Meet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21330</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 12:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21330</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry about the literalness of these ads (for example - &quot;how is a person meant to write their name on a basketball?). The ads are just stupid. 

I still don&#039;t even understand the CBA ad that floats the concept of them having used an American ad agency. It was a joke? It shows what they would do to overcome an ill-informed agency? I just really don&#039;t get it.
I think in reality, real CBA people did get pitched a series of ads from a half-brained agency but the real marketing staff actually were duped.
OR
The brief they gave the agencies was so stupid that the agencies could only come back with dross.

And why advertise anyway? The millions of dollars these ads cost will not be what encourages an individual or business to swap banks. They&#039;d be better off to channel their shareholders&#039; money into supporting worthy causes and show that even though they have no brains, they at least have hearts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry about the literalness of these ads (for example &#8211; &#8220;how is a person meant to write their name on a basketball?). The ads are just stupid. </p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t even understand the CBA ad that floats the concept of them having used an American ad agency. It was a joke? It shows what they would do to overcome an ill-informed agency? I just really don&#8217;t get it.<br />
I think in reality, real CBA people did get pitched a series of ads from a half-brained agency but the real marketing staff actually were duped.<br />
OR<br />
The brief they gave the agencies was so stupid that the agencies could only come back with dross.</p>
<p>And why advertise anyway? The millions of dollars these ads cost will not be what encourages an individual or business to swap banks. They&#8217;d be better off to channel their shareholders&#8217; money into supporting worthy causes and show that even though they have no brains, they at least have hearts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Redman</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21324</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Redman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21324</guid>
		<description>Please consider the audience we have here and the various responses. Unfortunately, much of the media we are subjected to is transparent to few. Many do not see through the blatant abuse of basic human psyche. Their marketing is working - to the disgust of a minority. I believe that people (especially Australians) are optimistic by nature and will appreciate the message that ComBank are portraying - we (and our competitors) have stuffed up in the &#039;past&#039; and we are the ones that are going to change. Whether they do or not is irrelevant as there will be a perception that they are providing better service!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please consider the audience we have here and the various responses. Unfortunately, much of the media we are subjected to is transparent to few. Many do not see through the blatant abuse of basic human psyche. Their marketing is working &#8211; to the disgust of a minority. I believe that people (especially Australians) are optimistic by nature and will appreciate the message that ComBank are portraying &#8211; we (and our competitors) have stuffed up in the &#8216;past&#8217; and we are the ones that are going to change. Whether they do or not is irrelevant as there will be a perception that they are providing better service!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21311</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21311</guid>
		<description>I think the issue is even deeper - since when has it become a consumer privilige for a company to offer its customers good service and a promise?

This should be something we receive as an absolute standard. This is not a privilege!

Its pretty sad that today a company can try to differentiate itself by telling us they will keep their promises and give us good customer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the issue is even deeper &#8211; since when has it become a consumer privilige for a company to offer its customers good service and a promise?</p>
<p>This should be something we receive as an absolute standard. This is not a privilege!</p>
<p>Its pretty sad that today a company can try to differentiate itself by telling us they will keep their promises and give us good customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesley-Ann</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21278</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesley-Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21278</guid>
		<description>Indeed...and don&#039;t get me started on those incredibly cheezy and almost amusingly insincere Westpac Ads. &quot;We&#039;re for &quot; How dumb do these banks really think we are???

&quot;Thank you&quot; to &#039;The Greater&#039; Building Society who has the thoughtfulness to use Jerry Seinfeld in their ads, following in the ING/Billy Conolly tried and true formula...at least then I feel like they&#039;ve made the effort to deliver their message in a way I at least find palatable ;)

Bank West have the best Ads by far...I believe they even make some sort of effort to keep their promises too! But that&#039;s just what I hear...I have no personal experience with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed&#8230;and don&#8217;t get me started on those incredibly cheezy and almost amusingly insincere Westpac Ads. &#8220;We&#8217;re for &#8221; How dumb do these banks really think we are???</p>
<p>&#8220;Thank you&#8221; to &#8216;The Greater&#8217; Building Society who has the thoughtfulness to use Jerry Seinfeld in their ads, following in the ING/Billy Conolly tried and true formula&#8230;at least then I feel like they&#8217;ve made the effort to deliver their message in a way I at least find palatable <img src='http://anthillonline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Bank West have the best Ads by far&#8230;I believe they even make some sort of effort to keep their promises too! But that&#8217;s just what I hear&#8230;I have no personal experience with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Blackman</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21276</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Blackman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21276</guid>
		<description>Nearly all of my business comes from referrals.  Referrals from past clients referring me to their network contacts, friends, business associates, customers, suppliers, and so on.

I wonder how many banks get their new business from referral?  It seems to me the main reason people change banks is to get away from an unfortunate experience.  A bit like incumbent governments that lose rather than oppositions that win.  Banks never actually win new business, they just pick up what another bank loses.

Oh yes, and the ad is incredibly annoying.  What is the child doing in the meeting anyway?  What does b-b-basket-ball have to do with anything.  How would a customer write anything meaningful on a ball, for Pete&#039;s sake?

I have a better idea.  Banks could provide suggestion forms, bricks and elastic bands at their branches.  A dissatisfied customer writes the suggestion onto the form, wraps it round the brick with the elastic band, goes outside and &quot;submits&quot; their suggestion by throwing it through the bank&#039;s shopfront window.  The bank acknowledges receipt with the brief sound of breaking glass.

That ought to make them take notice.

While they&#039;re at it, they could chuck one through the front window of the ad agency too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly all of my business comes from referrals.  Referrals from past clients referring me to their network contacts, friends, business associates, customers, suppliers, and so on.</p>
<p>I wonder how many banks get their new business from referral?  It seems to me the main reason people change banks is to get away from an unfortunate experience.  A bit like incumbent governments that lose rather than oppositions that win.  Banks never actually win new business, they just pick up what another bank loses.</p>
<p>Oh yes, and the ad is incredibly annoying.  What is the child doing in the meeting anyway?  What does b-b-basket-ball have to do with anything.  How would a customer write anything meaningful on a ball, for Pete&#8217;s sake?</p>
<p>I have a better idea.  Banks could provide suggestion forms, bricks and elastic bands at their branches.  A dissatisfied customer writes the suggestion onto the form, wraps it round the brick with the elastic band, goes outside and &#8220;submits&#8221; their suggestion by throwing it through the bank&#8217;s shopfront window.  The bank acknowledges receipt with the brief sound of breaking glass.</p>
<p>That ought to make them take notice.</p>
<p>While they&#8217;re at it, they could chuck one through the front window of the ad agency too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21272</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21272</guid>
		<description>does anyone else get teh feeling that banks are so deeply hated even marketing companies they pay the big bucks to don&#039;t want to paint them in a good light?  

between CBA&#039;s ads (the one mentioned above, coupled with all the related ads) just makes all decision makers at banks look like halfwits.  They want themselves portrayed as engaging snake oil salesmen to promote their services??  what?

And it is also the ANZ bank, where we are all meant to be amazed that an employee of their bank, who is high enough to be a boardroom decision-maker can actually come up with a good idea - THAT&#039;S how they want to best portray themselves?  Or another employee who can&#039;t manage to open the door to his office.  mmmm, good one ANZ, show your &quot;Falcon&quot; security system to be overly-complicated and not work anyway, GREAT advertising that.

And as for any bank claiming that they will promise to fix what&#039;s wrong - we all KNOW that this means &quot;Ooops, if we stuffed up, we&#039;ll fix it (because legally we have to anyway), but if it is just something you think we SHOULD do, well haw-haw-haw that won&#039;t happen because we own the bat and the ball in this game.&quot;  so what&#039;s the point of the ad?  

Dear CBA, I am not happy with paying an overdraught fee.  Please promise to fix it so I never get charged this again. - Oh yeah, I&#039;ll hold my breath on that one shall I?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone else get teh feeling that banks are so deeply hated even marketing companies they pay the big bucks to don&#8217;t want to paint them in a good light?  </p>
<p>between CBA&#8217;s ads (the one mentioned above, coupled with all the related ads) just makes all decision makers at banks look like halfwits.  They want themselves portrayed as engaging snake oil salesmen to promote their services??  what?</p>
<p>And it is also the ANZ bank, where we are all meant to be amazed that an employee of their bank, who is high enough to be a boardroom decision-maker can actually come up with a good idea &#8211; THAT&#8217;S how they want to best portray themselves?  Or another employee who can&#8217;t manage to open the door to his office.  mmmm, good one ANZ, show your &#8220;Falcon&#8221; security system to be overly-complicated and not work anyway, GREAT advertising that.</p>
<p>And as for any bank claiming that they will promise to fix what&#8217;s wrong &#8211; we all KNOW that this means &#8220;Ooops, if we stuffed up, we&#8217;ll fix it (because legally we have to anyway), but if it is just something you think we SHOULD do, well haw-haw-haw that won&#8217;t happen because we own the bat and the ball in this game.&#8221;  so what&#8217;s the point of the ad?  </p>
<p>Dear CBA, I am not happy with paying an overdraught fee.  Please promise to fix it so I never get charged this again. &#8211; Oh yeah, I&#8217;ll hold my breath on that one shall I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marney Perna</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21269</link>
		<dc:creator>Marney Perna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21269</guid>
		<description>Hi David
I totally agree with you.  The banks (in this case) can do whatever they want, and do by inserting a disclaimer in the fine print that says exactly that.  We are not responsible for any thing we do and you can do nothing about it.

Myself and many friends are caught up in the Storm Financial Scenario  and we are all being totally screwed by the banks, ASIC and Financial Planners all of whom have lied cheated and to date are getting away with it.  To top it off they are telling the general public how nice they are to sort out their mistakes and the public believe it, just wished it were true.

I believe the term &quot;honest banking&quot; or &quot;trust me I am a financial adviser&quot; are examples of an oxymoron.

There is nothing honest or trustworthy of any of them.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David<br />
I totally agree with you.  The banks (in this case) can do whatever they want, and do by inserting a disclaimer in the fine print that says exactly that.  We are not responsible for any thing we do and you can do nothing about it.</p>
<p>Myself and many friends are caught up in the Storm Financial Scenario  and we are all being totally screwed by the banks, ASIC and Financial Planners all of whom have lied cheated and to date are getting away with it.  To top it off they are telling the general public how nice they are to sort out their mistakes and the public believe it, just wished it were true.</p>
<p>I believe the term &#8220;honest banking&#8221; or &#8220;trust me I am a financial adviser&#8221; are examples of an oxymoron.</p>
<p>There is nothing honest or trustworthy of any of them.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21264</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21264</guid>
		<description>CBA has made mistake after mistake with some of my accounts.  They even had the audacity to claim that I had made the mistakes even-though I had all the evidence to prove that it was their shoddy operations and procedures.

That&#039;s right spend vasts amount of money on advertising campaigns instead of making wrongs right and improve your true service and image through word of mouth from happier customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBA has made mistake after mistake with some of my accounts.  They even had the audacity to claim that I had made the mistakes even-though I had all the evidence to prove that it was their shoddy operations and procedures.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right spend vasts amount of money on advertising campaigns instead of making wrongs right and improve your true service and image through word of mouth from happier customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ostryn</title>
		<link>http://anthillonline.com/how-to-trump-cunning-linguistics-and-seize-competitive-advantage/#comment-21263</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ostryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthillonline.com/?p=20963#comment-21263</guid>
		<description>I often write detailed and thoughtful responses to SC opinion pieces.  This one can be summed up in 2 words &quot;RIGHT ON!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often write detailed and thoughtful responses to SC opinion pieces.  This one can be summed up in 2 words &#8220;RIGHT ON!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

