While in Copenhagen for last year’s climate change summit, Anthill contributor Dave Sag had an opportunity to test drive the Fluence, Renault’s 100 percent electric car. As Sag reports, the loudest thing about the Fluence is its indicator. But is it a game-changer?
There’s something quite amazing about a car that makes no discernable sound when you start it. And I suppose that’s just something we’ll all be getting used to as this decade — the teenies, as they have been dubbed — rolls on.
While in Copenhagen for the COP15 climate change conference last year, I was fortunate enough to run across Renault’s new 100 percent electric Fluence. I’m not so excited by the name, but the thrill I got from driving it was unlike any legal car-related rush I’ve experienced.
The Fluence is a production-ready electric car, one of the first in the world and certainly the first one I’ve had the opportunity to drive. Unlike the much lauded Tesla, this is a family car and will retail in Australia for around AU$45,000 or so — or so the Renault people in Denmark thought. We’ll find out when this car is rolled out here in Canberra early in 2011.
|
The Fluence has a maximum range of 160 kilometres on a single charge, which is not much use for interstate trips, but quite adequate for running about town. But this is no little run-about; it’s a big, family sized car. To recharge, you either plug in to a special recharge station, or, if you are in a hurry, you can pull up to any Better Place charge point and simply swap out your empty battery for a full one. This process takes a couple of minutes, compared to many hours to recharge the battery via a cable.
Better Place is rolling out the first electric car recharge network in Canberra later this year. The empty batteries can be recharged via solar or some other clean-power, making the running of the cars that use their network — such as the Renault Fluence, but also other makes of car — truly emissions-free. What’s also interesting is you can apparently draw-back power from your car if you so wish. You pay for the recharging and battery swaps on a plan, much like the data-plan you buy with your phone.
So what’s it like to drive? Well I only had a short test-drive [video embedded below], but that was quite an amazing experience. First up, as I mentioned, it’s silent. The Renault tech had unfortunately left the radio on and tuned to a dead station which kind of spoiled the effect somewhat, but we soon turned that off and found that the Fluence just hums along: Indeed, the loudest part of the car is the indicator.
Once I’d navigated out of the hotel parking lot, through the petrol station I didn’t need, and past the armed soldiers that had been stationed to protect some visiting VIP, the novelty had started to wear off and it was really just like driving any ordinary car. It’s only got two gears, forward and backward, and of course neutral (is neutral a gear?).
The pickup is quite incredible; we shot to about 100kph in a matter of seconds before being forced to slow down to let a Danish pedestrian cross the road. Once I’d finished taking it for a spin I took a look at the engine and naturally it was as clean as a whistle. No oil, no grease, no moving parts at all. This car is going to do to the auto-parts industry what the iPod is doing to CD sales.
Of course electric cars have some way to go yet. The 160km maximum range, while a great effort on the part of Renault and Better Place, still means I’d have to recharge it three times on a drive from Canberra to Sydney, or about seven times if I wanted to drive to Adelaide. But if the Australian Federal Government is serious about greening their ComCar fleet, this would be absolutely perfect. Canberra’s much lamented taxi service could adopt these as part of a major overhaul, too (in my dreams).
However, battery density need only double three times and this car could easily make the trip to Adelaide on a single charge. And at the rate technology is advancing, we could hope for that to happen by around 2015 or so.
Widespread adoption of electric vehicles seems assured to me. Now we just need to convince people not to drive to their local shops. Electric cars are still no substitute for a nice walk or a pleasant bike ride.
Dave Sag Test Drives the Renault Fluence
Dave Sag is a founder, executive director and Chief Operating Officer of Carbon Planet, the global emissions management company. He lives in Canberra and does not actually own any car. Follow him on Twitter: @davesag
Are you wasting your money on online marketing?
Want an ad like this?Does online marketing get you confused? Are you properly exploiting social media? Do you understand search engine optimisation? Is your website delivering you enough business? If you answered Yes to any of these questions, it might be time to get some help.


View Comments
this is a test
March 15th, 2010 at 6:58 pm
[...] Test driving Renaut's 100% electric car, the Fluence (lame name … [...]
this is second test post
March 15th, 2010 at 7:00 pm
[...] Test driving Renaut's 100% electric car, the Fluence (lame name … [...]
Mike Lloyd
March 17th, 2010 at 9:52 am
Very interesting review. But I wonder if the question about whether if the question about recharging it when driving from Sydney to Adelaide is misplaced. How many of us actually drive big distances on a regular basis? I know I don’t. Upon which having an electric car as a second car, or something to get us to the airport or train station is perfectly feasible.
[Reply]
Dave Sag Reply:
March 17th, 2010 at 7:07 pm
Mike I agree that it would be a perfect city car but a bit expensive for a 2nd car I feel. Speaking as someone with no car though
[Reply]
Jason McAndrew Reply:
March 18th, 2010 at 8:32 pm
“How many of us actually drive big distances on a regular basis? I know I don’t.” Very short sighted comment Mike. You might not, and most might not, but there are lots of people that do drive huge distances regularly, whether interstate to visit family and friends, or around town all day for work. My point is that we need to get away from the concept of electric vehicles being for buzzing around town. If they are to have any impact at all then they need to design vehicles that the rest of us need like large family cars, utes, delivery vans, motorbikes, four-wheel-drives, small trucks, and eventually large trucks. Only then will electric vehicles really be a success.
[Reply]
james lithgow Reply:
March 19th, 2010 at 1:04 am
“How many of us actually drive big distances on a regular basis? I know I don’t.”
Well Actually that comment sums it up.. i havent looked at the statistics but no doubt the percentage of people who drive a short distance in there car EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR … well that is a huge percentage of the Australian population… Just like the TV commercial ( every ciggarette is doing you damage) well…. EVERY combustion engine is causing terrible damage and polluting our beautiful earth.. this car will do 160 km on 1 charge… WELL that is enough for most people in 1 day.. SO… imagine the IMPACT if those that only need 160 km or less each day.. use electric.. WELL>> short sighted to say that wont make an impact… THAT WOULD BE BLOODY FANTASTIC… QUIET ROADS.. QUIET CITIES .. CLEAN AIR.. JUST AS IT SHOULD BE….. then when the battery tech. improves.. the rest of the population who require long distance travel can jump onboard… EVERY CAR IS CAUSING US DAMAGE…
[Reply]
Jason McAndrew Reply:
March 19th, 2010 at 12:21 pm
Even if I were to drive 50km a day normally and long distance only once every three months it would be enough to stop me buying a car of that limited range (or load carrying capacity as another example), so initial uptake won’t have an impact until the vehicles offered match the work and lifestyle requirements of the bulk of the population.
Fernando
March 20th, 2010 at 3:23 am
This is the first generation of massive electric cars, the second generation will have maybe 250 km of range, in 2015-2016 (Deutsche Bank analysis: http://www.scribd.com/doc/28104500/Deutsche-Bank-Electric-Car-Analysis-Batteries)
[Reply]
danny
May 19th, 2010 at 8:21 pm
i travel long distance 450ks each time and that is just to get to where i am going 900 round trip i tow a caravan i think that this car would cost more then it would save
[Reply]
Samulswan
July 3rd, 2010 at 6:15 am
This is my second visit to this blog. We are starting a brand new initiative in the same niche as this blog. Your blog provided us with important information to work on. You have done a admirable job..
http://www.business-energy.com.au/
[Reply]